12.13 Sentence Patterns from a Functional Perspective
In order to summarise what we have learned, we will now look at some typical sentence patterns from a functional perspective. We will then conclude this section by looking at some untypical patterns, on the next page.
As we've seen, the Subject is usually (but not always) the first element in a sentence, and it is followed by the verb:
Pattern 1
Subject |
Verb |
David |
sings |
In this pattern, the verb is not followed by any Object, and we refer to this as an intransitive verb. If the verb is monotransitive, it takes a Direct Object, which follows the verb:
Pattern 2
Subject |
Verb |
Direct Object |
David |
sings |
ballads |
In the ditransitive pattern, the verb is followed by an Indirect Object and a Direct Object, in that order:
Pattern 3
Subject |
Verb |
Indirect Object |
Direct Object |
The old man |
gave |
the children |
some money |
Adjuncts are syntactically peripheral to the rest of the sentence. They may occur at the beginning and at the end of a sentence, and they may occur in all three of the patterns above:
Pattern 4
|
(Adjunct) |
Subject |
Verb |
Indirect Object |
Direct Object |
(Adjunct) |
[1] |
Usually |
David |
sings |
|
|
in the bath |
[2] |
Unfortunately |
the professor |
wants |
|
to retire |
this year |
[3] |
At the start of the trial |
the judge |
showed |
the jury |
the photographs |
in a private chamber |
Pattern 4 is essentially a conflation of the other three, with Adjuncts added. We have bracketed the Adjuncts to show that they are optional. Strictly speaking, Objects are also optional, since they are only required by monotransitive and ditransitive verbs, as in the examples [2] and [3] above.
12.14 Some Untypical Sentence Patterns
The sentence patterns we looked at on the previous page represent typical or canonical patterns But you will often come across sentences which do not conform to these patterns. We will look at some of these here.
Extraposition
The Subject is sometimes postponed until the end of the sentence. Here are some examples:
In first place is Red Rum
Inside the house were two detectives
More important is the question of compensation
Here, the typical declarative order has been disrupted for stylistic effect. In these examples, the Subject comes after the verb, and is said to be EXTRAPOSED. Compare them with the more usual pattern:
In first place is Red Rum |
~Red Rum is in first place |
Inside the house were two detectives |
~Two detectives were inside the house |
More important is the question of compensation |
~The question of compensation is more important |
The Subject is also extraposed when the sentence is introduced by anticipatory it:
It is a good idea to book early
It is not surprising that he failed his exams
In the more typical pattern, these constructions may sound stylistically awkward:
To book early is a good idea
That he failed his exams is not surprising
Extraposition is not always just a matter of style. In the following examples, it is obligatory:
It seems that he'll be late again |
~*That he'll be late again seems |
It turned out that his secretary had stolen the money |
~*That his secretary had stolen the money turned out |
Direct Objects, too, can be extraposed. Recall that their typical position is after the verb (Pattern 2). However, when anticipatory it is used, the Direct Object is extraposed:
He made it very clear that he would not be coming back
Again, the canonical pattern is stylistically very awkward:
*He made that he would not be coming back very clear
A declarative sentence, such as David studied English at Oxford can be reformulated as:
It was David who studied English at Oxford
This is called a CLEFT SENTENCE because the original sentence has been divided (or "cleft") into two clauses: It was David and who studied English at Oxford. Cleft sentences focus on one constituent of the original sentence, placing it after it was (or it is). Here we have focussed on the Subject David, but we could also focus on the Direct Object English:
It was English that David studied at Oxford
or on the Adjunct at Oxford
It was at Oxford that David studied English
Cleft constructions, then, exhibit the pattern:
It + be + focus + clause